Code Review Bootcamp for an Early-Stage Mobile Team
Overview
What this challenge is about.
Read the team's last 100 merged PRs (export provided) and tag the 10 worst review threads (rubber-stamp, bikeshed, missing context). Draft a 4-page code-review guideline covering pre-PR self-review, reviewer scope (correctness, security, readability, tests), and tone. Build a 5-criterion reviewer rubric the team will use during sessions. Run 6 live 45-minute review sessions on real open PRs over 2 weeks, recording 3 for the bootcamp library. Measure PR cycle time and the 7-day defect-escape rate before week 1 and after week 2. Deliver the guideline, rubric, recordings, and a 1-page measurement summary.
The Brief
What you'll do, and what you'll demonstrate.
Move a 4-person mobile team from rubber-stamp review to evidence-backed reviews in 2 weeks, measured by cycle time and defect-escape.
Earning criteria — what you'll demonstrate
- Diagnose common code-review failure modes from PR history
- Author a guideline that scales beyond the people who wrote it
- Facilitate a code review live without it becoming personal
- Measure code-review quality with concrete metrics, not vibes
Program Fit
Where this fits in your program.
Sharpens the same skills your degree expects you to demonstrate.
Skills
Skills you'll demonstrate.
Each one shows up on your verified credential.
Careers
Roles this prepares you for.
Real titles. Real skill bridges. Pick the one closest to your trajectory.
Career mappings coming soon.