Sometimes called the case method or Harvard case method. Distinct from a real challenge by the presence of a historical answer the discussion converges on.
The case study method is a teaching approach where students analyse structured business cases — usually with a known historical context — and discuss the decisions involved. It is a strong format for reasoning practice. Students learn to weigh trade-offs, frame ambiguous problems, and articulate their reasoning under critique.
Its limit is as evidence of work. Because cases have a known historical answer, the discussion converges on the right framing rather than producing a unique deliverable. A recruiter reviewing case-study work sees reasoning, not work product.
Case studies and Ewance challenges both teach reasoning. The difference is the artefact. A case-study session leaves the student with a class participation note. An Ewance challenge leaves the student with a unique deliverable, rubric-graded, attached to a verifiable credential. Both kinds of practice belong in a strong undergraduate programme; the second kind is what builds a portfolio.
The fastest way to know whether challenge-based learning fits you is to ship one.
